" We do not plan to put one American foot on the field "
(U.S. Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta, Lisbon, 13 January)
Luc MICHEL for PCN-SPO:
With AFP – Reuters / 2013 01 20/
French intervention in Mali. Belgian participation since previous Tuesday (*). Meeting of Ministers of the EU to support this attack – we have no sympathy for Islamists of AQMI, needless to say, but they are an exploited pretext – many explanations have been advanced …
“Françafrique” colonial nostalgia in Paris deluding itself on the former greatness of France. Or help to a former colony.
Control of uranium and natural resources.
Without forgetting the famous "population protection" that tirelessly pours the Atlanticist West whenever its conspiracies and interventions provoke a humanitarian catastrophe.
All this can be explained but is not the real reason for the new Franco-Belgian neo-colonial adventure.
FRANCE – BELGIUM – EU – REASONS FOR THE FRANCO-BELGIAN INTERVENTION DECRYPTED: THE AGENDA OF WASHINGTON IN MALI
While France, followed by Belgium on Tuesday, engages in Mali, the foreign ministers of the 27 countries of the European Union will for their part hold an extraordinary meeting on Mali in Brussels on Thursday.
It is indeed to die in Mali to serve the strategic interests of the U.S.in sub-Sahelian Africa. Once again, the NATO countries will be the colonial infantry used by the Pentagon. To preserve the precious lives of Boys from overseas.
"The United States is prepared to provide France with all the necessary assistance to restore security in Mali," said Tuesday in Lisbon the U.S. Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta, "excluding any deployment of U.S. forces on the field. Our hope is to work with the French to provide any assistance we can to help them in their efforts "(sic), Mr. Panetta said after a meeting with his Portuguese counterpart, José Aguiar- Branco.
"Our hope is that they manage to succeed and establish better security in Mali," he said, adding: "We do not plan to put one American foot on the field. "On the plane on his way to Lisbon, Mr Panetta had said that the United States was willing to provide" logistical support "to France and using intelligence against the Islamists, including Al Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb (AQIM).
A NOTE AND A FACT: DYING FOR WASHINGTON …
A first remark:
Let us listen to and decrypt the head of the State Department. "We've always been concerned about the efforts of Al Qaeda to establish bases" "Panetta had said." Our commitment since September 11 has been pursuing al-Qaeda wherever it is to make sure it has nowhere to hide. Our efforts to weaken Al-Qaeda in Yemen were successful" and “we have also succeeded in our efforts to pursue it in Somalia '"(sic) he said. "The work is not finished and we must continue the effort to pursue Al-Qaeda where it decides to move" because "Al Qaeda remains a threat," he added. "The fact is that the war against terrorism continues and we have made real progress to undermine their ability to conduct attacks they would like to do," he said.
What clearly and decrypted means: France (and Belgium) is there to serve the interests of Washington. And the neo-colonial dreams of Paris, which still seems to believe in Françafrique are just an excuse to sell to the French establishment the new colonial war.
Once again the NATO politicians engage in a war against the interests of Greater Europe (2). Once more young Europeans – and our heart bleeds to their unnecessary sacrifice in the service of interests that do not concern them – will die for Washington! And the name of the operation chosen by the French generals of NATO clearly indicates the level of mental infection of European minds by the U.S. within NATO "Operation Serval (Wolverine)”, from the name of a Yankee comic book character, the X-Men …
ATLANTICIST SCHIZOPHRENIA: THE REAL QUESTION
Then comes a question, THE real question:
Which should arise both in Washington and Paris or Brussels.
How to analyze the schizophrenia of NATO?
How to explain this insane strategy that led, in the "Greater Middle East" and Africa to support the same Islamist jihadists in Libya and Syria, to install them in power and then to fight them in Afghanistan, to join with them in Doha , Karachi or Riyadh, but to fight them in the Sahel?
The answer is called "strategy of chaos", theorized in the most recent American works of geopolitics. Chaos as in Libya. Which resulted the one in the Sahel and in Mali. Before that in Syria. On the model of Somalia, exploded, divided, ruined.
And if this was one of the options planned by Washington and its Zionist ally for the "Greater Middle East"? A "Greater Somalia" where U.S. imperialism in economic and financial bankruptcy, can still inexpensively dominate trade routes and plunder the resources … This is my analysis from the premises of the so-called "Arab Spring", which crisis in the Sahel and in Mali is the consequence.
Chaos as the future for the Middle East and Africa and not an impossible "liberal democracy", chaos and the "Somaliazation" both as a means and objective of a project of imperialist domination: that of the twenty-first " American century! "
(1) Luc MICHEL, "TINTIN IN MALI": BELGIUM OPERATES IN MALI!,
on THE REPUBLIC OF EUROPE:
only in French on : http://www.elac-committees.org/2013/01/15/la-republique-deurope-%C2%AB-tintin-au-mali-%C2%BB-la-belgique-intervient-au-mali/
(2) Wars against The Libyan Jamahiriya, Afghanistan and Irak, without forget the war against Ba’athisqt Syria, are, before all, “wars against the Greater-Europe”, to speak such as General Von Lohausen. Austrian General and geopolitical scientist Lohausen (1907-2002), former member of the General Staff of Marshal Rommel, close to the anti-Nazi patriots of 20 July 1944, is part of the result of the geopolitical theories of Jean Thiriart "Europe from Vladivostok to Dublin." He wrote glowing pages on the European draft of Thiriart the Years 1960-1975.
The general's main book of geopolitics MUT ZUR MACHT. DENKEN IN KONTINENTEN, translated for the story in French by one of the secretaries of THIRIART, is part of the School of HAUSOFER, but also incorporates many concepts of THIRIART. Lohausen in particular speaks of "Europe from Madrid to Vladivostok." In the copy offered by Lohausen to Thiriart in 1983 (which I got with his library in 1999) is the following dedication: "In respectful tribute to a great European."